US DOE Must Weigh Number of Competing Interests in Deciding US LNG Exports, Professor Says

US DOE Must Decide Weather to Approve More LNG Exports or Not

The public comment period for the US DOE’s “2012 LNG Export Study” recently closed leaving the DOE with the task of reviewing thousands of initial comments and reply comments.

Under existing US law, the DOE must now decide whether approving additional LNG export projects is in the “public’s interest” based on the application of Policy Guidelines issued in 1984 as well as any other factors to the extent they are shown to be relevant to the public interest determination. These other factors might include the impact of exports on U.S. energy security, the impact of exports on the U.S. economy, consumers, industry, and jobs creation, the impact on the U.S. balance of trade, international and geopolitical considerations, environmental considerations, and consistency with DOE’s long-standing policy of promoting competition in the marketplace through free negotiation of trade agreements.

According to a Reply Comment (#168) submitted by Susan L. Sakmar, a Visiting Law Professor at the University of Houston School of Law and also the author of the forthcoming book, ENERGY FOR THE 21ST CENTURY: OPPORTUNITIES AND CHALLENGES FOR LNG, the public is divided as to whether or not these factors favor LNG exports with three main positions emerging from a review of the initial comments submitted:

  1. LNG exporters and energy companies support unlimited LNG exports on the basis that the 2012 LNG Export Study found that under all scenarios considered, the United States will benefit economically from the international sale of LNG;
  2. environmental groups such as the Sierra Club and some members of the general public oppose LNG exports since it will lead to more shale gas development and “fracking”; and
  3. industrial users of natural gas, such as Alcoa, Dow Chemical, and the Industrial Energy Consumers of America (IECA) argue against allowing “unfettered” LNG exports which might lead to large price spikes or shocks.

After reviewing the totality of the arguments raised in the comments, and after noting that just one project, Cheniere Energy’s Sabine Pass Liquefaction project has received DOE approval to export LNG to non-FTA countries, while a number of other export projects have had their applications effectively on hold for years, Professor Sakmar offers the following recommendations to advance the export approval process while ensuring that the DOE fulfills its mandate to protect the “public’s interest”:

  1. Immediately re-start the approval process by approving a limited number of export applications in an amount not likely to have a significant impact on the domestic price of natural gas or the “public’s interest.” In this regard, there are numerous studies that are publicly available, including a pricing study done by the DOE that may provide some guidance as to what “the sweet spot” might be in terms of the number of projects or the volume of LNG.
  2. Immediately develop a fair and transparent process and procedure that details how the DOE will fulfill its stated obligation to “monitor the cumulative impacts” of approving additional export applications. This process should be as detailed as possible and also have some sort of set timeframe for action so that companies can plan accordingly.
  3. In line with the above recommendation, the DOE might also consider phasing in the approval of projects over a certain period of time so as to minimize the potential impacts on price and/or as more information becomes known about natural gas supply, demand and the potential environmental impacts of hydraulic fracturing and shale gas development.

LNG World News Staff, March 05, 2013

Share this article

Follow LNG World News

One thought on “US DOE Must Weigh Number of Competing Interests in Deciding US LNG Exports, Professor Says”

Comments are closed.

Events>

<< Jul 2016 >>
MTWTFSS
27 28 29 30 1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
25 26 27 28 29 30 31

Gas to Liquids

The volatile oil price has had a dramatic impact on the Gas to Liquids market and some large-scale projects’ operators have struggled to adapt to this unsteady landscape. Over the last 12 months, we have witnessed a few promising projects halt or even shut down altogether. However, whilst some doors have had to close, other doors are opening with interesting emerging markets on the new GTL field. A few companies have discovered ways to significantly reduce operating costs and prove to be commercially viable despite the current economic climate.

Against this backdrop, SMi’s 19th annual Gas to Liquids conference will discuss how GTL companies can work with the tumbling oil price and how they can build robust strategies and create effective alternative solutions to enable them to weather the storm. The programme will have a special focus on small-scale GTL projects, giving you the chance to hear first-hand success stories from leading GTL operators. The two-day event will provide the ideal platform for experts to discuss with peers what companies need in place in order to overcome today’s challenges, with leading industry figures dissecting cutting edge topics, including project financing, marketing of GTL projects and innovative alternative applications of GTL plants.

For more information and to register online, visit: www.gas-to-liquids.co.uk

read more >

LNG Pricing, Trading & Risk Management: 2-Day Course

This is a highly practical course in which participants will receive and use the LNG Analysis Toolkit…

read more >

LNGgc London

LNGgc 2016 has established itself as a prestigious LNG industry platforms in UK and Europe…

read more >

World LNG & Gas Series: 8th Asia Pacific Summit

The 8th Annual World LNG & Gas Series: Asia Pacific Summit is back in September…

read more >